In our Riga to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 31 minutes, completing the 1045km route in 12h 56min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 56min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~163 kWh
- Distance: 1045km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
12h 56min |
13h 27min |
| Charging time: |
22min |
53min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~188 kWh |
~188 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Stacja Paliw WATIS (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (18 min, 51% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (10 min, 30% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Stacja Paliw WATIS (15 min, 17% → 74%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1045km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~163 kWh vs ~192 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons