In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 134 minutes, completing the 2084km route in 22h 42min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 42min (134 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~324 kWh
- Distance: 2084km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
22h 42min |
24h 56min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
3h 20min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~377 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OBI (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
SB Tank Langer (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Genshagen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (25 min, 11% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Q8 Le Rœulx Sud (11 min, 22% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell Eupen (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Lichtendorf Süd (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Hansestraße (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Autohof (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohaus König (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Rogoziniec (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen A2 MOP Krzyżowniki (11 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
Karczma Rzym (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 11:
Kaufland (49 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 12:
Vilniaus (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 13:
Girelė (12 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 134-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 2084km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 3h 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~324 kWh vs ~331 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons