In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 336 minutes, completing the 2085km route in 23h 19min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 19min (336 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 49min
- Energy: ~383 kWh
- Distance: 2085km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
| Travel time |
23h 19min |
28h 55min |
| Charging time: |
1h 49min |
5h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~386 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (23 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Q8 Süd (10 min, 24% → 32%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (41 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohof Bantorf (19 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (25 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Sycowska (61 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel Port Kopytkowo (19 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 8:
Ford Gołębiewski (118 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
Rastplatz (42 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 336-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 2085km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 49min vs 5h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~383 kWh vs ~431 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons