In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 52 minutes, completing the 2083km route in 23h 23min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 23min (52 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 53min
- Energy: ~374 kWh
- Distance: 2083km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
23h 23min |
24h 15min |
| Charging time: |
1h 53min |
2h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~377 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Eupen (11 min, 14% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Gütersloh Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (24 min, 10% → 32%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Q8 Le Rœulx Sud (10 min, 24% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (15 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohaus Weber (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
HEM Tankstelle Lahe (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Industrie und Gewerbepark Mittelelbe (14 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohaus König (15 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Karczma Rzym (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland (44 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 10:
Vilniaus (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 11:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 52-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 2083km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 53min vs 2h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~374 kWh vs ~408 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons