In our Riga to Paris EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 55 minutes, completing the 2082km route in 23h 12min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 12min (55 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 50min
- Energy: ~373 kWh
- Distance: 2082km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
23h 12min |
24h 7min |
| Charging time: |
1h 50min |
2h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~376 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (33 min, 50% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohaus König (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (13 min, 19% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Vilniaus (30 min, 21% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Gajewo Zachód (17 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Orlen A2 MOP Tulce (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Walewice (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (13 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 9:
Ehrenberg West (13 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Bierset (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 11:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (16 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 55-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 2082km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 50min vs 2h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~373 kWh vs ~408 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons