In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 337 minutes, completing the 2147km route in 23h 18min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model X 2023's 460km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 23h 18min (337 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 48min
- Energy: ~378 kWh
- Distance: 2147km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
28h 55min |
23h 18min |
| Charging time: |
5h 54min |
1h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~386 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Q8 Süd (10 min, 24% → 32%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (41 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohof Bantorf (19 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (25 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Sycowska (61 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel Port Kopytkowo (19 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 8:
Ford Gołębiewski (118 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
Rastplatz (42 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Riga
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 14% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (27 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (18 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 337-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 2147km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 48min vs 5h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~378 kWh vs ~443 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons