In our Paris to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q8 e-tron 55 by 77 minutes, completing the 1423km route in 14h 7min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 7min (77 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~232 kWh
- Distance: 1423km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q8 e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
14h 7min |
15h 24min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~256 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Mâcon, Saint-Albain (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q8 e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Mâcon, Saint-Albain (17 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières, Étrembières (13 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (27 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (32 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti, Ciliegi (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (14 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 77-minute advantage over Audi Q8 e-tron 55 on this 1423km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~232 kWh vs ~324 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons