In our Paris to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Single Motor by 305 minutes, completing the 2162km route in 21h 42min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 42min (305 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~353 kWh
- Distance: 2162km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Single Motor |
| Travel time |
21h 42min |
26h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
5h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~397 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (13 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Jimmy's Fun Park (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Eisentratten (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX90 Single Motor Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (10 min, 12% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
XXXLutz Mann Mobilia (17 min, 12% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Total Tankstelle Gablinger Weg (15 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Metro (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Hotel Seven (17 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Ina (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Stop Shop (192 min, 13% → 79%)
-
Stop 9:
Stop Shop (18 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 305-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Single Motor on this 2162km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 5h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~353 kWh vs ~499 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons