In our Sofia to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Single Motor by 66 minutes, completing the 2159km route in 21h 38min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 38min (66 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~352 kWh
- Distance: 2159km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Single Motor |
| Travel time |
21h 38min |
22h 44min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
2h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~392 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (17 min, 69% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eisentratten (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
REWE Nymphenburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Adolf-Seebacher-Straße (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Volvo EX90 Single Motor Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV A1 (20 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (16 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Emmezeta Jankomir (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Avtocestno počivališče Radovljica Sever (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Genussplatzl Eben - Imbiss, Fleisch & Wurst (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Samerberg Nord (10 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Burgauer See Nord (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Gartencenter Streb (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de Keskastel Est (16 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (16 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 66-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Single Motor on this 2159km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 2h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~352 kWh vs ~498 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons