In our Paris to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 8 minutes, completing the 1238km route in 11h 38min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 38min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 33min
- Energy: ~202 kWh
- Distance: 1238km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
11h 38min |
11h 46min |
| Charging time: |
33min |
40min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~223 kWh |
~223 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's, Ramstein-Miesenbach (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden, Herrieden (12 min, 13% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle, Suben (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Geistkircher Straße Rohrbach, St. Ingbert (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Bonfelder Straße, Bad Rappenau (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Total Tankstelle, Brunn (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Meggenhofen, Meggenhofen (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 8-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1238km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 33min vs 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~202 kWh vs ~227 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons