In our Paris to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 67 minutes, completing the 1238km route in 11h 35min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 35min (67 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~193 kWh
- Distance: 1238km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
11h 35min |
12h 42min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
1h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~223 kWh |
~223 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's, Ramstein-Miesenbach (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden, Herrieden (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle, Suben (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Verdun Saint Nicolas Sud, Haudiomont (16 min, 18% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's, Ramstein-Miesenbach (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße, Bad Rappenau (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden, Herrieden (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Tankstelle, Brunn (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle, Suben (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West, Amstetten (12 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 67-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1238km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 1h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~193 kWh vs ~197 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons