In our Paris to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 132 minutes, completing the 2080km route in 20h 23min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 23min (132 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 19min
- Energy: ~324 kWh
- Distance: 2080km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 23min |
22h 35min |
| Charging time: |
1h 19min |
3h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~374 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 25% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Irxleben (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rogoziniec (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Niesułków (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (21 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Delfood Dépôt (11 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell Eupen (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Lichtendorf Süd (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
EnBW Schnellladepark (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohaus König (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Rogoziniec (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen MOP Osiecza III (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 10:
MOP Mogiły (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 11:
Kaufland (28 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 12:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (28 min, 10% → 80%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 132-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 2080km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 19min vs 3h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~324 kWh vs ~331 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons