In our Paris to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 9 minutes, completing the 1585km route in 15h 0min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 0min (9 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~259 kWh
- Distance: 1585km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
15h 0min |
15h 9min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~285 kWh |
~286 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Aachener Straße 1100 (14 min, 11% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Targowa Górka (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Hansestraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohaus König (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Lądek (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 9-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1585km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~259 kWh vs ~291 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons