In our Paris to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Standard Range by 106 minutes, completing the 1585km route in 15h 0min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 0min (106 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~259 kWh
- Distance: 1585km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Standard Range |
| Travel time |
15h 0min |
16h 46min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
2h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~285 kWh |
~287 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Aachener Straße 1100 (14 min, 11% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Targowa Górka (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Ford Capri Standard Range Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lukoil Tertre (17 min, 26% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell Eupen (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Bandwirkerstraße (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (12 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle Grabower Straße (16 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
MOP Koryta (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 11:
Orlen MOP Osiecza III (13 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 106-minute advantage over Ford Capri Standard Range on this 1585km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 2h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~259 kWh vs ~262 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons