In our Paris to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 95 minutes, completing the 1586km route in 14h 54min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 54min (95 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~247 kWh
- Distance: 1586km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 54min |
16h 29min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
2h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~285 kWh |
~287 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OBI (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Targowa Górka (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Delfood Dépôt (11 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell Eupen (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Lichtendorf Süd (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
EnBW Schnellladepark (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohaus König (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Rogoziniec (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen MOP Osiecza III (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 95-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1586km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 2h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~247 kWh vs ~252 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons