In our Paris to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 13 minutes, completing the 1379km route in 13h 35min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 35min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~215 kWh
- Distance: 1379km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
13h 35min |
13h 48min |
| Charging time: |
35min |
47min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~248 kWh |
~248 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (11 min, 17% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Jimmy's Fun Park (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Eisentratten (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (11 min, 15% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
EnBW HyperNetz (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eisentratten (15 min, 14% → 72%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 13-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1379km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~215 kWh vs ~253 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons