In our Zagreb to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 15 minutes, completing the 1386km route in 13h 37min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 37min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~216 kWh
- Distance: 1386km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
13h 37min |
13h 52min |
| Charging time: |
35min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~249 kWh |
~247 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Samerberg Nord (13 min, 16% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Adolf-Seebacher-Straße (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Genussplatzl Eben - Imbiss, Fleisch & Wurst (10 min, 25% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Euro Hotel (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
P+M Mitfahrerparkplatz A8 Karlsbad (17 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1386km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~216 kWh vs ~254 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons