In our Prague to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 39 minutes, completing the 1995km route in 20h 6min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 6min (39 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~310 kWh
- Distance: 1995km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
20h 6min |
20h 45min |
| Charging time: |
1h 25min |
1h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~359 kWh |
~360 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tópark (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol A1 (19 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Skotina dir Athen (24 min, 10% → 81%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Győr (10 min, 14% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 14% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Korinos dir Athen (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 6:
Atalanti Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 39-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1995km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 1h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~310 kWh vs ~366 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons