In our Prague to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 11 minutes, completing the 1279km route in 12h 41min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 41min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 37min
- Energy: ~199 kWh
- Distance: 1279km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
12h 41min |
12h 52min |
| Charging time: |
37min |
43min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~230 kWh |
~235 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Hofer (10 min, 49% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
Cantagallo Ovest (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 16% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Old Wild West (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 11-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1279km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 37min vs 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~199 kWh vs ~235 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons