In our Rome to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 14 minutes, completing the 1301km route in 12h 41min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 41min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 36min
- Energy: ~202 kWh
- Distance: 1301km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
12h 41min |
12h 55min |
| Charging time: |
36min |
47min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~234 kWh |
~230 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Povegliano Est (11 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (15 min, 13% → 71%)
- Arrival: Prague
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Campogalliano Est (10 min, 13% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Paganella Est (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Defreggerweg (13 min, 11% → 65%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1301km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 36min vs 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~202 kWh vs ~239 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons