In our Rome to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 13 minutes, completing the 1424km route in 14h 4min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 4min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~222 kWh
- Distance: 1424km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
14h 4min |
14h 17min |
| Charging time: |
38min |
52min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~256 kWh |
~256 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire du Creux-Moreau (11 min, 11% → 61%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (15 min, 19% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire du Creux-Moreau (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 13-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1424km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~222 kWh vs ~261 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons