In our Rome to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 25 minutes, completing the 1920km route in 19h 37min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 37min (25 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~299 kWh
- Distance: 1920km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 37min |
20h 2min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~346 kWh |
~346 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Sant'Ilario Nord (11 min, 14% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire De Lespignan Nord (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Parcheggio del Cimitero (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Rinovo Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Nabrigas (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
ANDGO (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 25-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1920km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~299 kWh vs ~353 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons