In our Prague to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 29 minutes, completing the 898km route in 8h 32min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 32min (29 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 21min
- Energy: ~140 kWh
- Distance: 898km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 32min |
9h 1min |
| Charging time: |
21min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~162 kWh |
~162 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Oberpfälzer Alb Nord (10 min, 57% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
Nentershausen Ost (11 min, 18% → 65%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K Autohof Tennenlohe (13 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststätte Epgert (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 29-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 898km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 21min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~140 kWh vs ~148 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons