In our Prague to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 110 minutes, completing the 1677km route in 21h 47min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 47min (110 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 59min
- Energy: ~261 kWh
- Distance: 1677km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 47min |
23h 37min |
| Charging time: |
59min |
2h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Guzew Południe (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Autogala Volvo (19 min, 24% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 19% → 59%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ALDI (10 min, 44% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Bar Mettos (12 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Guzew Południe (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Mogiły (14 min, 14% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (26 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rudniki Południe (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (15 min, 24% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 11:
Rimi Niidu (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 12:
Neste Pääsküla (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 110-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1677km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 59min vs 2h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~261 kWh vs ~267 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons