In our Prague to Lisbon EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 574 minutes, completing the 2680km route in 26h 41min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 41min (574 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 41min
- Energy: ~437 kWh
- Distance: 2680km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
26h 41min |
36h 15min |
| Charging time: |
1h 41min |
7h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~482 kWh |
~508 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ATU (10 min, 14% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Zone de trois Couronnes (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Lieu dit Le Mont (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Super U (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Ouest (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 6:
Area El Canto (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Cepsa (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Castelo Branco Oeste (10 min, 21% → 62%)
- Arrival: Lisbon
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (23 min, 29% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Hôtel Mercure Strasbourg Aeroport (30 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire de Pont Val de Saône (59 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Parking Stade Aquatique (56 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Pech Montat Ouest (56 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Novotel Bordeaux Aéroport (39 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 7:
Repsol Tankstelle (47 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Avia (81 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 9:
Galp Loja Tangerina Oeste (83 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Lisbon
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 574-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2680km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 41min vs 7h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~437 kWh vs ~504 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons