In our Prague to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 91 minutes, completing the 1283km route in 14h 28min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 28min (91 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~200 kWh
- Distance: 1283km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 28min |
15h 59min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
1h 59min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Guzew Południe (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Autogala Volvo (19 min, 24% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ALDI (10 min, 44% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Bar Mettos (12 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Guzew Południe (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Mogiły (14 min, 14% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (26 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rudniki Południe (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (15 min, 24% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 91-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1283km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 1h 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~200 kWh vs ~204 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons