In our Prague to Rome EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 13 minutes, completing the 1284km route in 13h 19min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron's 416km range doesn't beat the Audi e-tron GT's 389km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 13h 19min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 11min
- Energy: ~287 kWh
- Distance: 1284km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
13h 32min |
13h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
1h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mies-van-der-Rohe-Straße (13 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Hofer (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Eni Paganella Ovest (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Electra Old Wild West (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (12 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle (13 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Hofer (19 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Garda Ovest (19 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 13-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1284km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 11min vs 1h 18min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons