In our Prague to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 63 minutes, completing the 1307km route in 12h 53min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 53min (63 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~234 kWh
- Distance: 1307km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 53min |
13h 56min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
1h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~235 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 25% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 13% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Old Wild West (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Prague (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Telis Finanz (10 min, 20% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (14 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Hofer (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Eni Paganella Ovest (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Electra Mantova Village (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Ristorante Goyo (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (14 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 63-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1307km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 1h 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons