In our Rome to Prague EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 54 minutes, completing the 1276km route in 12h 56min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 56min (54 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 48min
- Energy: ~229 kWh
- Distance: 1276km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 56min |
13h 50min |
| Charging time: |
48min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~230 kWh |
~230 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Campogalliano Est (11 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Paganella Est (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Defreggerweg (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 24% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Povegliano Est (19 min, 11% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Al Tornante Panorama Restaurant & Pizzeria (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
REWE Nymphenburger Straße (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
ALDI Süd (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Kladruby jih (12 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 54-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1276km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 48min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons