In our Riga to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 107 minutes, completing the 1691km route in 18h 59min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 59min (107 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~263 kWh
- Distance: 1691km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
18h 59min |
20h 46min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
2h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~304 kWh |
~306 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (10 min, 59% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (14 min, 16% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Vilniaus (38 min, 19% → 88%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (11 min, 10% → 32%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Gajewo Zachód (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Żnin Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen A2 MOP Gnilec (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
NORMA (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
Magic Spielhalle (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
WSO Sicherheitsdienst (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 11:
Tango Vundelaar (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 107-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1691km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 2h 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~263 kWh vs ~269 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons