In our Riga to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 12 minutes, completing the 2819km route in 32h 3min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 32h 3min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 14min
- Energy: ~439 kWh
- Distance: 2819km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
32h 15min |
32h 3min |
| Charging time: |
2h 21min |
2h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~507 kWh |
~507 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 7:
Makpetrol A1 (26 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 8:
IKEA (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (13 min, 32% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Korinos dir Athen (28 min, 10% → 87%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 12-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 2819km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 14min vs 2h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~439 kWh vs ~460 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons