In our Riga to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 62 minutes, completing the 1044km route in 13h 10min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 10min (62 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 33min
- Energy: ~170 kWh
- Distance: 1044km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 10min |
14h 12min |
| Charging time: |
33min |
1h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~188 kWh |
~188 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Livonija (10 min, 83% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Stacja Paliw WATIS (13 min, 13% → 67%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (49 min, 34% → 88%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Krauz Oil (11 min, 18% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
OTO Park Handlowy (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Stacja Paliw Moya Rymarska (11 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 62-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1044km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 33min vs 1h 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~170 kWh vs ~173 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons