In our Berlin to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 60 minutes, completing the 1044km route in 13h 19min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 19min (60 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~170 kWh
- Distance: 1044km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 19min |
14h 19min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~188 kWh |
~188 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (10 min, 21% → 32%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OTO Park Handlowy (13 min, 12% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Krauz Oil (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka (40 min, 20% → 87%)
-
Stop 4:
Norfa XL Bernotiškės (22 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 60-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1044km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~170 kWh vs ~173 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons