In our Riga to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 8 minutes, completing the 1951km route in 21h 38min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 38min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1951km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 46min |
21h 38min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
1h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~351 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (14 min, 57% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohof Schwabach West (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (10 min, 59% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Autohof Brück (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
dm-drogerie markt (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 8-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1951km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 1h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~318 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons