In our Riga to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 124 minutes, completing the 1950km route in 21h 38min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 38min (124 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~303 kWh
- Distance: 1950km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 38min |
23h 42min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
3h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~352 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (10 min, 59% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Autohof Brück (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
dm-drogerie markt (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (42 min, 29% → 96%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 29%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (14 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Żnin Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen A2 MOP Gnilec (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Leipzig Flughafen (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
Frankenwald West (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 10:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 11:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 12:
Sindelfinger Wald (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 13:
Aral Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 124-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1950km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 3h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~303 kWh vs ~307 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons