In our Riga to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 61 minutes, completing the 1951km route in 22h 11min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 11min (61 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 40min
- Energy: ~350 kWh
- Distance: 1951km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
22h 11min |
23h 12min |
| Charging time: |
1h 40min |
2h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~352 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (33 min, 50% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Olsze Południe (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohof Schwabach West (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Empfinger Hof (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K (43 min, 40% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 21%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Południe (24 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dopiewiec (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Hohenlohe Nord (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 10:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 61-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1951km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 40min vs 2h 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~350 kWh vs ~436 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons