In our Riga to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 74 minutes, completing the 1289km route in 14h 16min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 16min (74 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~210 kWh
- Distance: 1289km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
14h 16min |
15h 30min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
1h 44min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~232 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 29% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (36 min, 14% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (15 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 14% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (12 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 74-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1289km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 1h 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~210 kWh vs ~213 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons