In our Riga to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 119 minutes, completing the 1802km route in 25h 37min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 11, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 37min (119 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 51min
- Energy: ~280 kWh
- Distance: 1802km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
25h 37min |
27h 36min |
| Charging time: |
1h 51min |
3h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~324 kWh |
~361 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (23 min, 35% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka Pogodna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 3:
Revia Park (27 min, 16% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (22 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Sucedava (29 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (15 min, 50% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (25 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel & Restauracja Olivia (28 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Witolda (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Handlowe (10 min, 21% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Južná trieda (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
Auchan (17 min, 16% → 64%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Oradea Shopping City (21 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 10:
MOL Ștefan cel Mare (19 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 12:
Kaufland Gavana (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 119-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1802km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 51min vs 3h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~280 kWh vs ~287 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons