In our Riga to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 70 minutes, completing the 1802km route in 25h 37min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 37min (70 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 51min
- Energy: ~280 kWh
- Distance: 1802km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
25h 37min |
26h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 51min |
2h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~324 kWh |
~332 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (23 min, 35% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Biedronka Pogodna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 3:
Revia Park (27 min, 16% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (22 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Sucedava (29 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (13 min, 50% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 10% → 93%)
-
Stop 3:
Park Handlowy Korkowa (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Pogodna (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Revia Park (12 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
King Cross Leopolis (33 min, 10% → 91%)
-
Stop 7:
Maysternya Smaku (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland Sucedava (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Scorpion Exim (26 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 70-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1802km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 51min vs 2h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~280 kWh vs ~284 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons