In our Riga to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 47 minutes, completing the 1357km route in 16h 30min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 30min (47 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 45min
- Energy: ~211 kWh
- Distance: 1357km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 30min |
17h 17min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
2h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~244 kWh |
~278 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (15 min, 11% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Xland (20 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (13 min, 50% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 10% → 92%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Nowostawy (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Signalbau (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Győr (12 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 47-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1357km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 45min vs 2h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~211 kWh vs ~214 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons