In our Riga to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 1001km route in 20h 58min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 58min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~156 kWh
- Distance: 1001km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 8min |
20h 58min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
20min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~180 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lauku iela (10 min, 65% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 13% → 58%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 13% → 56%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1001km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~156 kWh vs ~163 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons