In our Riga to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 649 minutes, completing the 1000km route in 20h 58min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 58min (649 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~156 kWh
- Distance: 1000km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 58min |
31h 47min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
2h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~252 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 13% → 56%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K (12 min, 25% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
K-Supermarket Mankkaa (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Ykkös Cafe (22 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (29 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Circle K (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Boglundsängen (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Preem Grums (20 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 649-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1000km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 2h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~156 kWh vs ~158 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons