In our Riga to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 81 minutes, completing the 1283km route in 14h 28min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 28min (81 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~209 kWh
- Distance: 1283km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
14h 28min |
15h 49min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
1h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Nowostawy (12 min, 35% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
ALDI (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (36 min, 14% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (15 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Nowostawy (16 min, 14% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Bar Mettos (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
ALDI (17 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 81-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1283km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 1h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~209 kWh vs ~212 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons