In our Riga to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 80 minutes, completing the 1283km route in 14h 24min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 24min (80 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~200 kWh
- Distance: 1283km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 24min |
15h 44min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Nowostawy (10 min, 36% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
ALDI (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (18 min, 72% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 10% → 92%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Nowostawy (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Michałowice Północ (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
ALDI (19 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 80-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1283km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~200 kWh vs ~202 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons