In our Riga to Prague EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 49 minutes, completing the 1292km route in 15h 44min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 15h 44min (49 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 58min
- Energy: ~204 kWh
- Distance: 1292km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 33min |
15h 44min |
| Charging time: |
2h 28min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~233 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Norfa XL (28 min, 13% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (25 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell (12 min, 15% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Bolimów (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel Na Półboru (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen Michałowice Północ (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
ALDI (25 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (18 min, 72% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 10% → 92%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Nowostawy (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Michałowice Północ (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
ALDI (19 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 49-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1292km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 58min vs 2h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~204 kWh vs ~219 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons