In our Riga to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BYD Seal U Design by 115 minutes, completing the 2416km route in 25h 27min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 27min (115 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 31min
- Energy: ~394 kWh
- Distance: 2416km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BYD Seal U Design |
| Travel time |
25h 27min |
27h 22min |
| Charging time: |
1h 31min |
3h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~435 kWh |
~435 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Zachód (15 min, 20% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Billa Töschling (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 13% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
BYD Seal U Design Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 77% → 87%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (28 min, 16% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Górski (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dobieszowice Zachód (17 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Signalbau (19 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Tankstelle Hirschstettner Straße (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Tankstelle (18 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 10:
Ledra Ovest (24 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 11:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (21 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 12:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (19 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 115-minute advantage over BYD Seal U Design on this 2416km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 31min vs 3h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~394 kWh vs ~525 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons