In our Riga to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 74 minutes, completing the 2416km route in 25h 27min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 27min (74 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 31min
- Energy: ~394 kWh
- Distance: 2416km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
25h 27min |
26h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 31min |
2h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~435 kWh |
~435 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Zachód (15 min, 20% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Billa Töschling (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 13% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (23 min, 39% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (11 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 5:
Uniwar P1 (14 min, 12% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
Raststation (18 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Ledra Ovest (20 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 10:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (18 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 11:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (17 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 74-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 2416km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 31min vs 2h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~394 kWh vs ~420 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons