In our Riga to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG P7 RWD Long Range by 56 minutes, completing the 2416km route in 25h 27min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 27min (56 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 31min
- Energy: ~394 kWh
- Distance: 2416km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
XPENG P7 RWD Long Range |
| Travel time |
25h 27min |
26h 23min |
| Charging time: |
1h 31min |
2h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~435 kWh |
~435 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Zachód (15 min, 20% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Billa Töschling (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 13% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
XPENG P7 RWD Long Range Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland (21 min, 19% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 14% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Dobieszowice Zachód (13 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Signalbau (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell (11 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Mer Ladepark (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 9:
Ledra Ovest (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 10:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 11:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (14 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 56-minute advantage over XPENG P7 RWD Long Range on this 2416km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 31min vs 2h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~394 kWh vs ~431 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons