In our Riga to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 14 minutes, completing the 2112km route in 24h 22min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 22min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~329 kWh
- Distance: 2112km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 36min |
24h 22min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
1h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~380 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 2112km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 26min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~329 kWh vs ~345 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons