In our Riga to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 144 minutes, completing the 2112km route in 24h 36min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 36min (144 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 38min
- Energy: ~345 kWh
- Distance: 2112km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
24h 36min |
27h 0min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
3h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 44% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (36 min, 14% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (15 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Autogala Volvo (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell MOP West (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Połomskiego (13 min, 11% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Wolkera (22 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesco (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (26 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV smer Beograd (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 10:
JP Putevi Srbije (20 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 11:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 144-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 2112km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 38min vs 3h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~345 kWh vs ~349 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons